Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Carmilla

Carmilla, by Sheridan LeFanu, was a very enjoyable novella for me, as I must admit; I’ve found myself caught up in the surge of fanatical worship of all things vampire related these days. I’ve read quite a few books on the subject in the past year or two, but I think I really enjoyed Carmilla because it brought it back to the roots of the lore. The novella to me seemed to be more authentic and archetypal than any of the stories I’ve enjoyed recently.
The story made me interested in finding out just how vampire folklore fits into Irish Literature. I was curious as to whether or not the subject was common for the country, as I couldn’t think of any other obvious examples. I was surprised to learn that Bram Stoker, who most famously created the tale of Dracula, was actually Irish as well. I realized that I had never given thought to what Bram Stoker’s ethnicity was, but I would not have pegged him as Irish, though I have no explanations why.
Through my explorations into the subject, I see that vampires really were not very prevalent in Irish literature, although there are a few tales to be found, as well as a notable use of vampire imagery in James Joyce’s Ulysses.
Focusing on the Carmilla work, there are many parts of the story that intrigued me. Although it was written almost a century and a half ago, I found it very easy to follow. In my experience, many stories dating back to the later nineteenth century can be hard to relate to or read without having to stop and check vocabulary or wording. This was not the case for me this time. I was able to breeze right through the story- finishing it in one sitting (although it is not too difficult of a feat, considering the length of it). I found myself being able to see the story though Laura’s eyes. When many of the young women of the area were succumbing to this mysterious illness and Laura worried that perhaps a plague was upon them, it made me really imagine being alive in those times, when plagues were not just something we read about in history lessons, but a harsh reality.
One thing the story leaves me wanting of an explanation was- who were the accomplices who set up the situations where Carmilla (or Millarca) was left with the unsuspecting families? Who was the woman who pretended to be her mother, or the elderly black woman in the carriage after it was righted? Maybe these relations were explained, but if they were, I must have missed it. At first, I imagined that they were also vampires, and they all worked together, but according to the story, upon the desecration of Mircalla Karnstein’s body, the region was relieved of the mysterious attacks that were ultimately explained by the vampire activity.
Overall, I was genuinely entertained with the story of Carmilla and wish there was more to it! It kept me on my toes and my emotions heightened throughout its entirety. Not only was I rooting for Laura to figure out the cause of her ailments and to overcome the threat, but I also in ways found myself liking Carmilla and hoping she would somehow change her vampiric ways! (if that’s possible!) In truth, I held a very American attitude I suppose, hoping that she could be “rehabilitated” and reintroduced to society as a non-threat, ha ha. In the end though, I understood that she had to be destroyed and peace restored to the region, but I was left feeling that the story left a door open to further exploits if the author had so chosen to explore.

2 comments:

  1. Joy,

    I too have been caught up in the vampire novel scene for the past two years or so now. These novels include Succubus Blues, Betrayed, and Twilight (before it became over-exploited.) I also thought that it was nice to go back to even before Dracula to see where it all started, with Carmilla. The novel was interesting and captured my attention right away, which wasn’t what I was expecting judging from my interest in the last few readings. I was also surprised by the famous Dracula being inspired by this certain tale, because Dracula is more widely known, and maybe that’s due to the homosexual tones of this novel, but who am I to say. Like I commented on someone else’s blog, I didn’t know that people wrote openly about homosexuality in that day and age, but maybe LeFanu thought about braving it since Ireland was at a low point in history and perhaps people weren’t really prioritizing criticizing novels (tongue twister!) Either way, it surprised me.
    I liked when you wrote, “. Although it was written almost a century and a half ago, I found it very easy to follow. In my experience, many stories dating back to the later nineteenth century can be hard to relate to or read without having to stop and check vocabulary or wording.”
    I definitely agree with you on this, I could follow this story and exactly what was going on from the very beginning. And also, I too was wondering about the elderly black woman in the carriage—who was she exactly? Good question.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Joy,

    I was also surprised to find out Bran Stoker was Irish. Dracula has been one of my favorite horror novels (I've read it three times). It is really interesting to learn the Carmilla was written some 25 years before and was a major influence on Stoker. It seems like Stoker took the constructed vampire outline of Carmilla and changed the gender. The original manuscript of Dracula was also set in the same place as Carmilla: Styria. Stoker later changed it to Transylvania. Carmilla seemes to be mirrored in the character Lucy from Dracula.

    Anyways, I found it very interesting when you said
    " In truth, I held a very American attitude I suppose, hoping that she could be “rehabilitated” and reintroduced to society as a non-threat, ha ha. In the end though, I understood that she had to be destroyed and peace restored to the region, but I was left feeling that the story left a door open to further exploits if the author had so chosen to explore."

    I think that by making Carmilla a vampire, Le Fanu takes away her humanness. By doing this I think he is able to let a sexually repressed Victorian society ponder imposed gender roles on women. Also, this allows female sexuality and the homosexual undertones to be contemplated by the reader in a time where that subject matter was very taboo.I couldn't figure out what Le Fanu's intentions were in presenting liberated and independent women.

    Like you said,

    " In the end though, I understood that she had to be destroyed and peace restored to the region, but I was left feeling that the story left a door open to further exploits if the author had so chosen to explore."

    Carmilla is also a villain. She is deceptive and manipulative in her independence. Also, there seems to be a theme where all of the male characters are subject to female desires which leads to Carmilla's empowerment. It is hard to tell whether Le Fanu is presenting feminism in a positive or negative way. However, I think that the way he writes leaves the subject matter very openended so it is open to the interpretation of the reader. This could have been his goal as well.
    Anyways, I really liked your post. peace
    -Nate

    ReplyDelete