Tuesday, March 2, 2010

"Gothic's Enigmatic Signifier: The Case of J. Sheridan Le Fanu's 'Carmilla'"

“Gothic’s Enigmatic Signifier: The Case of J. Sheridan Le Fanu’s ‘Carmilla’” by Michael Davis brought up some interesting points of view for me. To be honest, the first few pages I found myself glazing over while attempting to absorb what I could from the reading. A little ways in, however, I started having a much easier time understanding what the author was conveying. After I was able to fully launch myself into the paper, I found that Davis makes quite a few interesting points and presents theories about the novella that I had not considered. The topic he brings up that really caught my eye was that of the absence of Laura’s mother- which I will be focusing on in this blog.

In this article, Davis’s zeroing in on the absence of Laura’s mother and how this effects the story opened my eyes to the possibilities Le Fanu leaves for speculation. Without a mother in her life, Laura unknowingly has a void that Carmilla uses to her advantage. Carmilla attempts to gain favor with Laura at first, through presenting herself as that loving, maternal link Laura is missing. Although Laura has been brought up by Madame Peredon, who supplies her with a mother-like substitute, Davis theorizes that Laura does indeed subconsciously remembers the actual bonded relationship with her mother and is missing it. I liked the quote from the story that Davis uses to introduce the reader to Carmilla’s first attempts at gaining Laura’s devotion and trust in a maternal way, which was:

“Her murmured words sounded like a lullaby in my ear, and soothed my resistance into a trance, from which I only seemed to recover myself when she withdrew her arms.”

Here, Carmilla is tapping into Laura’s weaknesses by exploiting her lack of a mother. Carmilla easily can see that this is a good tactic to magnetize herself to these girls, as we also learned how she bewitches General Spielsdorf’s niece, who is also mother-less.

Davis continues the subject by suggesting that by presenting herself as a motherly figure, Carmilla is able to broach the loving, soothing side as well as the darker and more fearful aspects of the relationships. By showing herself as this figure the girls have been longing for- one who will provide them with such an enthralling and captivating array of emotions that they had never experienced- the comfort and deep attachments- Carmilla is able to expose them to her strange and troubling traits, that would normally scare anyone away. Because the girls are so drawn to the positive, they are able to overlook the negative. This is a method Davis describes as “good mother” or “bad mother” when he writes,

“The ambivalence Laura experiences towards ‘the demonic shadow mother’ is, as I have already suggested, the result of a split between that which she comprehends, the soothing caresses of the ‘good’ mother or ‘good’ breast, and that which, untranslated, sinks into the unconscious to remain there as an ‘encysted’, troubling and potentially traumatic enigma- the other side of the split: the ‘bad’ mother or ‘bad’ breast."

Going along with the importance of a maternal theme in the story, Davis also makes a note of mentioning the opposite, paternal relationship factors towards the end of the article. I liked how he tied this factor in, as I think it does deserve a mention. Here, Le Fanu depicts Laura’s father and General Speilsdorf as being somewhat typical male characters- strongly devoted and protective. Although they tried with all of their physical might to protect their daughters (or niece in General Spielsdorf’s case) they were not able to protect them emotionally. Obviously- Bertha did not survive the encounter with Carmilla at all, so General Spielsdorf’s efforts were in vain, but he was able to fulfill his goal of “avenging” her death by bringing an end to the threat of the vampires. Laura’s father was able to help in the assassination of Millarca, but the emotional trauma Laura experienced will remain with her forever, regardless of any protection her father yearns to provide her with.

All in all, although, as mentioned earlier, I found the article hard to muster through at the very beginning, I ultimately ended up engrossed in it and all the theories that Davis presented. I enjoyed how his writing got me to think more analytically and to put more into dissecting the story and asking “why?” This allowed me to start making connections that I would not have made otherwise.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Joy,

    I also thought that the absence of Laura’s mother was an interesting undercurrent throughout the novel (as pointed out by Davis). You made a valid observation when you said,

    “Without a mother in her life, Laura unknowingly has a void that Carmilla uses to her advantage. Carmilla attempts to gain favor with Laura at first, through presenting herself as that loving, maternal link Laura is missing”

    I think you are absolutely right to conclude that Carmilla takes advantage of the void in Laura’s life and thus manipulates her by forming a maternal bond.

    In the novel it says,

    “Laura informs us that her mother ‘died in [her] infancy’ (243). This loss, I believe, haunts Le Fanu’s text as an uncanny absent presence. Laura claims that she does not even remember her mother because she lost her ‘so early.’ Initially, it seems, it was Madame Peredon ‘whose care and good nature in part supplied the loss of her mother. But the amnesia that, Laura believes, has left no memory trace is in fact not total. Laura does remember her mother, albeit unconsciously, and this becomes evident in her maternal transference to Carmilla” (227).

    One of the things I have noticed about Gothic’s text is the theme of how the past virtually affects the present. Le Fanu seems to focus on the past and its complex impact on the origins and state of the present. The fact that Laura lost her mother in her past, seems to play a large role in the present. And then enters Carmilla who substitutes as a maternal figure in the present. Then the picture of Laura’s relative from the past, whom eerily resembles Carmilla in the present. Past comes back to enter the present. The fact that Laura can’t seem to let go of Carmilla, must be because of an issue from her past.

    I tend to get off topic when doing these readings but your post inspired me to view things from a different angle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Its good that you found something of interest in the piece. I have to agree with you, the beginning is a little rough on the reader even if it is well intentioned. Although the maternal issues that you choose to focus on didn't quite draw me in while I was reading, I like the way you expounded on what you found. I especially enjoyed your analysis of the emotional bonding done here, "By showing herself as this figure the girls have been longing for- one who will provide them with such an enthralling and captivating array of emotions that they had never experienced- the comfort and deep attachments- Carmilla is able to expose them to her strange and troubling traits, that would normally scare anyone away. Because the girls are so drawn to the positive, they are able to overlook the negative."

    With the choices of analysis here, I guess I'm a little surprised you didn't delve in the Oedipal developments that Davis went into near the end of the piece. Although you did take the time to make mention of the paternal relationship between Laura and her father (as well as the General and Bertha) I think that the relationships there may have a bit more too them than you took the time to look at. However since the maternal relationship seemed to be your primary focus I suppose that I can't blame you. However I'm looking forward to more of your work!

    WS

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am really glad that you decided to focus in on the idea of the absent mother from Davis’ writing. It was something that I didn’t quite understand or think that I agreed with I’ve always felt like a lack of a parent is something that is pinpointed as something that is troublesome for someone, especially a youth.
    I didn’t think of Carmilla necessarily taking advantage of the fact that laura was missing a mother. But as you mentioned Camilla was certainly nurturing to Laura but I cannot say that I am sold on the idea that Laura was subconsciously remembering her ties to her mother through the actions of Carmilla. Although it does seem that the fact that Camilla is so loving and kind to her is what has drawn Laura close to her and perhaps even infatuated her with Carmilla.
    Like always the critique gave the reading a bit more sustenance and depth. It seems like we all had a bit to say about Davis and his ideas.

    ReplyDelete